PolicyCost.org

Measuring the human cost of federal policy changes since January 2025

American Dream Deferred: Methodology

The "American Dream Deferred" counter tracks the additional economic burden placed on American families due to recent policy changes. This counter accumulates the financial costs across healthcare, energy, housing, food, and education sectors, representing the growing financial strain on households.

Current Rate

$3,080 dollars every second

Daily Impact

$266.1 million per day

Annual Projection

$97.1 billion per year

Data Sources

Healthcare Cost Analysis

Research on increased out-of-pocket costs for individuals losing healthcare coverage and facing reduced preventative services.

Energy Cost Projections

Department of Energy analysis showing increased household costs due to Energy Star program elimination.

Housing Assistance Data

HUD data on Section 8 reductions affecting 500,000+ households with voucher support.

Food Security Analysis

USDA projections on food costs increases for families affected by SNAP/WIC reductions.

Education Cost Studies

Analysis of increased education costs due to reduced financial aid and support program eliminations.

Calculation Methodology

Healthcare Cost Increases

Formula: Per-Person Cost Increase × Affected Population
Variables:
  • Per-Person Cost Increase: $3,000 annually for those losing coverage
  • Affected Population: 12.5 million people
  • Total Impact: $37.5 billion annually
Explanation:

When individuals lose healthcare coverage, they face significantly higher out-of-pocket costs for routine care, medications, and emergency services. The $3,000 figure represents the average additional annual cost based on healthcare economic models comparing insured vs. uninsured individuals. This component represents approximately 38.6% of the total economic burden.

Energy Cost Increases

Formula: Per-Household Energy Efficiency Loss × Affected Households
Variables:
  • Per-Household Loss: $500 annually (from Energy Star elimination)
  • Affected Households: 80 million households
  • Total Impact: $40 billion annually
Explanation:

The elimination of the Energy Star program and related efficiency standards results in higher energy costs for American households. The Department of Energy previously estimated that Energy Star saved households an average of $450-500 annually through efficient appliances and building standards. This component represents approximately 41.2% of the total economic burden.

Housing Cost Increases

Formula: Average Voucher Value × Households Losing Support
Variables:
  • Average Voucher Value: $12,000 annually
  • Affected Households: 500,000 households
  • Total Impact: $6 billion annually
Explanation:

The $26.7 billion cut (43% reduction) to rental assistance affects approximately 500,000 households receiving housing vouchers. When families lose housing support, they must allocate significantly more of their income to housing, creating financial strain across all other budget categories. This component represents approximately 6.2% of the total economic burden.

Food Cost Increases

Formula: Average Benefit Reduction × Affected Households
Variables:
  • Average Benefit Reduction: $2,800 annually per household
  • Affected Households: 2 million households
  • Total Impact: $5.6 billion annually
Explanation:

SNAP and WIC benefit reductions directly increase food costs for recipient families. The $230 billion proposed cut over 10 years translates to significant per-household impacts. This is particularly burdensome for families with children, who face an increase in both financial strain and potential food insecurity. This component represents approximately 5.8% of the total economic burden.

Education Cost Increases

Formula: Average Support Loss × Affected Students
Variables:
  • Average Support Loss: $8,000 annually per student
  • Affected Students: 1 million students
  • Total Impact: $8 billion annually
Explanation:

Educational program cuts, including the elimination of TRIO serving 800,000 low-income students and reductions to Federal Work-Study, increase the financial burden on students and families pursuing education. This translates to higher student debt, delayed education, or educational opportunity loss. This component represents approximately 8.2% of the total economic burden.

Economic Inequality Context

The economic burden tracked by this counter falls disproportionately on those least able to absorb additional costs:

  • Bottom 50% Wealth Share: The bottom 50% of Americans hold only 6% of the country's wealth, making them particularly vulnerable to policy-induced cost increases.
  • Cascading Effects: Economic pressures in one area often create ripple effects across household budgets. For example, increased housing costs may force reductions in healthcare utilization or food quality.
  • Long-term Consequences: Short-term financial strain often leads to long-term economic penalties through increased debt, damaged credit, and reduced economic mobility.

Limitations and Assumptions

  • Geographic Variation: Actual costs may vary significantly by region, with some areas experiencing higher or lower impacts.
  • Income Distribution: The counter does not fully account for the distribution of costs across income levels, though evidence suggests lower-income households face disproportionate impacts.
  • Future Market Adjustments: The counter does not account for potential market adjustments that might partially mitigate some cost increases over time.
  • Individual Mitigation Strategies: Families will implement various coping strategies that may reduce some costs but often at the expense of quality of life or future economic security.

Important Note on Data Interpretation

This counter uses real economic data that has been extrapolated to represent the financial burden inflicted by current policy changes. While the specific figures are approximations, the scale of impact is supported by substantial evidence from economic analyses. These numbers are intended to provide a visceral, immediate understanding of the financial consequences that might otherwise remain abstract in policy discussions.

The figures presented are ballpark estimates, but the magnitude is so vast that there is no doubt the real impact will be felt by millions of American families, particularly those already struggling with economic insecurity. These costs represent real sacrifices in healthcare, nutrition, housing quality, educational opportunity, and overall financial stability.

PolicyCost.org is designed as a visualization tool to help people grasp the scale and urgency of these impacts, not as a definitive economic analysis. Our goal is to make visible what might otherwise remain hidden in technical reports and policy documents – the kitchen table impact of policy decisions on everyday Americans.

References

  1. Department of Energy. (2024). "Energy Efficiency Standards and Household Costs."
  2. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2025). "Section 8 Program Funding Analysis."
  3. Congressional Budget Office. (2025). "Medicaid Funding Reduction Impact Assessment."
  4. USDA Economic Research Service. (2025). "SNAP Benefit Changes and Household Food Security."
  5. Department of Education. (2025). "Financial Aid Reduction Impact Study."
  6. Federal Reserve. (2024). "Distribution of Household Wealth in the United States."